Publications in the archive have been identified as no longer current. They have been archived for reference, research or record keeping only, and will not be altered or updated after the date of archiving.

Archived publications that were published prior to July 2010 may not be compliant with WCAG2 Level AA Guidelines. For more information about our compliance with web accessibility guidelines, view our accessibility statement.

You can request an inaccessible document to be converted into an accessible format by emailing

Showing 461 to 464 out of 464 results.

This regulatory impact statement was prepared by George Wilkenfeld and Associates and released in November 1999. This document is a supplement to the original RIS. It does not reconsider the issues of mandatory vs voluntary labelling, or mandatory vs voluntary MEPS. The original RIS found that part of the case for mandatory MEPS was that, unlike voluntary labelling, it provides a framework in which the effectiveness of energy labelling can be increased.

This plan goes further than any previous public description of the program. For the first time, a three-year program plan transparently identifies those areas targeted for expansion. The plan describes our agenda in this field and explains our processes for meeting those challenges.